Apparatuses, systems and methods for performing remote real-time experiments

ABSTRACT

Embodiments of the present invention include apparatuses and methods for performing remote experiments in real-time. The method includes sending requests to perform remote experiments for a desired configuration to a first and second facility. The desired configuration may include a first and second configuration. The method includes running a first remote experiment in real-time at the first facility to obtain a first output variable. The first facility may include the first configuration with a first input variable. The method includes simultaneously running a second remote experiment in real-time at a second facility to obtain a second output variable. The second facility may include the second configuration with a second input variable. The first output variable may be set as the second input variable to mimic the desired configuration. The method includes obtaining experimental results of the desired configuration via the first and second input and output variables.

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional PatentApplication No. 62/067,315, filed on Oct. 22, 2014, which isincorporated herein by reference.

Multiphase flow in pipes is a complicated problem. Two methods arecommonly used to investigate the multiphase flow characteristics inpipes and optimize their production: (1) steady-state correlations,which are derived from massive experimental data with limited flowconditions; and (2) steady-state or transient mechanistic models, whichare subjected to experiment-derived closure relationships. Both methodspresent generic mathematical models to predict well performance for awide range of scenarios. However, the accuracy of such models is limitedto the range of flowing conditions included in empirical correlationsand closure relationships. Indeed, engineers have to often extrapolatethese empirical correlations without fully understanding theconsequences of such extrapolations.

Additionally, in some high pressure/temperature or near-critical pointfluid reservoirs, the pressure-volume-temperature (PVT) characterizationmay be dramatically inaccurate. Flow assurance is another importantissue when investigating problems in transporting hydrocarbon fluids inthe oil and gas industry.

However, insufficient information or knowledge currently existsregarding how to model these phenomena or how to mathematicallycharacterize the effect of compositional changes while hydrocarbons areflowing in wellbores and pipelines. The usual way to characterize thesecomplex phenomena is to move the well site into a lab and conductexperiments to determine potential responses/results. Field scalefacilities have been developed all over the world in the past fewdecades. These facilities include, but are not limited to, the (1) PERTTLab at Louisiana State University (“Facility 1”), (2) SINTEF MultiphaseFlow Laboratory in Norway (“Facility 2”), (3) TowerLab at Texas A&MUniversity (“Facility 3”), and the (4) TUFFP Facility at University ofTulsa (“Facility 4”). These facilities feature field-scale wells withdepths up to 5,800-ft deep and a variety of configurations andcapabilities, which may be used for training, testing, and researchrelated to multiphase flow in wellbores and surface equipment. Forexample, Facility 1 includes field-scale vertical wells and fieldequipment availability, while Facility 2 features a field-scalehorizontal pipeline and high-pressure equipment set-ups used toinvestigate multiphase flows. A study conducted by Falcone et al. (2008)includes a worldwide review of available research facilities formultiphase flow testing, highlighting the capabilities of thesefacilities.

The development of Facilities 1 to 4 likely required a large capitalinvestment. However, other facilities around the world are still beingbuilt to perform tests that are already available in these majorlaboratories/facilities. In fact, many of these laboratories are beingpartially replicated over and over again, with millions of dollars beingspent every year to build new experimental equipment with very similarcharacteristics/features as these pre-existing facilities. Indeed,building new lab facilities demand a significant amount of investment;however, the subsequent use of the same labs appears to be minimal. InAustralia alone, it is estimated that 400 million dollars is spent everyyear to develop new labs, but only 10% of these labs are being usedafter they become operational.

As long as a facility has a desired configuration, it can reproduce awide range of configurations of production systems and scenarios foundin the oil and gas industry. Examples of these configurations andscenarios include, for example, pipelines with different diameters andgeometrical configurations (vertical, horizontal, and inclined),multiple wells, and flow-assurance related problems such as wax/paraffindeposition in pipes and hydrate formation, downhole equipment design andoptimization. However, research facilities are generally far away fromcompany working sites, and are often not user friendly, requiringexternal technical staff to carry out experimental runs.

An ideal laboratory may combine all the features from these differentfacilities in a unique laboratory to cover a majority of the challengesfound regarding multiphase flow in the oil and gas industry. However,developing a new lab with all these features or physically moving allthis infrastructure to one single location will likely be extremelyexpensive and time consuming.

Now, with increased speed and reliability of electronics and networkingcomputing technology, some efforts have been made in the past thirtyyears to develop laboratories using automation systems to schedule,control, and acquire test results though the internet. Earlier studiesin the oil and gas industry involved the development of an automationsystem to schedule and monitor, from a remote computer, tests oflaboratory displacement experiments, the main objective being to run adisplacement test to measure permeability, which requires long waitingperiods to finish the tests. The automation system provided for a safeenvironment for high pressure tests and required minimal operatorintervention to perform all needed tests. Further, the remote experimentwas capable of controlling pump rate, valve switching, scheduling tests,and acquiring results over the internet. Another recent study at TexasA&M University developed a remote real-time system to control,visualize, save acquired data, and compare experimental datasimultaneously with numerical models for Facility 3.

The use of these remote experiments may also open new avenues to theimplementation of hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) studies applied topetroleum engineering problems. HIL requires very similar hardware andsoftware to what is required to perform remote experiments. HIL has beensuccessfully applied in the automotive and aviation industry, savingmillions of dollars while testing new technologies. For example, HILallows for testing of an autopilot system in the aviation industrywithout performing the tests using an airplane. Also, extremely harshconditions can be tested in cars without the need for actually creatingthese harsh conditions in a lab. In other words, when a scenario is toodifficult to be created in a lab, a simulator can simulate and generatethe output of such an environment using, for example, electronic sensorsand actuators. In the petroleum industry, HIL may be used to testdownhole equipment under extreme high-pressure and high-temperature,without the need of testing such equipment downhole and in harshconditions. For example, one study by Pedersen and Smogeli (2013)developed a HIL testing experimental set-up for drilling controlsystems, without the need for bring these new control systems to thefield.

Because experiments are usually expensive, time consuming, and requirespecialized apparatus, the use of numerical simulators have also spreadexponentially in the oil and gas industry. The cost of numericalsimulation is relatively cheap and easy to use, and can very oftenpresent results in a matter of seconds. However, the development ofnumerical models may sometimes take weeks to be accomplished, and anyensuing results may be questionable without proper validation withexperimental data. This is particularly true for newly developedtechniques and equipment, when reliable mathematical models may notalways be readily available, and implementation in the field may be timeconsuming and expensive.

Further, most of the numerical models being used (particularly inmultiphase flow) still require the use of empirical correlations orclosure relationships derived from experiments—which have limitationsregarding the range of conditions used to generate these empiricalrelationships. Along with increased sophistication of numerical modelsover the years, experiments have also become specialized to investigateand validate these same models. However, since different fields ofexpertise are involved in these (multiphase flow) models, the results ofany specialized experiments in these fields have generally not beenavailable in one particular facility/institution; rather, the labsconducting these specialized experiments are located all over the world.Thus, since data is needed from multiple labs/facilities locatedworldwide, validation of simulators that includes multiple physicalphenomena has become extremely difficult and time consuming.

Embodiments of the present invention relate to apparatuses, systems, andmethods for performing remote experiments, and in particular thoughnon-limiting embodiments, to apparatuses, systems, and methods forperforming remote real-time experimental diagnostics for wellchallenges.

In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method forperforming remote experiments is provided. The method includes sendingat least a first request and a second request to perform remoteexperiments for a desired configuration to at least a first facility andsecond facility, respectively. The desired configuration may include atleast a first configuration and a second configuration. The methodincludes running a first remote experiment in real-time at the firstfacility to obtain a first output variable. The first facility mayinclude the first configuration with a first input variable. The methodincludes simultaneously running a second remote experiment in real-timeat a second facility to obtain a second output variable. The secondfacility may include the second configuration with a second inputvariable. The method includes obtaining experimental results of thedesired configuration using the first and second input and outputvariables. The first remote experiment may communicate with the secondremote experiment such that the first output variable is set as thesecond input variable to mimic the desired configuration.

The method may include using a numerical simulator to perform numericalsimulations of the desired configuration and obtain simulated results,and to validate and tune the simulated results with the experimentalresults. The method may include using a server to send the first andsecond requests to perform remote experiments to the first or secondfacilities, respectively. The server may include a database of resultsfrom previously run remote experiments. The server may be configured tosearch the database for results from remote experiments previously runfor the desired configuration. The method may include using the serverto receive the first output variable from the first facility, and tosend the first output variable to the second facility for use as thesecond input variable. The method may include using a first dataacquisition system at the first facility, and a second data acquisitionsystem at the second facility. The first data acquisition system mayreceive the first request for remote experiments and run the firstremote experiment at the first facility to obtain the first outputvariable. The second data acquisition system may receive the secondrequest for remote experiments and run the second remote experiment atthe second facility to obtain the second output variable. The seconddata acquisition system may receive the first output variable from thefirst facility for use as the second input variable. The first andsecond data acquisition systems may operate valves, pumps andcompressors to set the first input variable and second input variable.The first input and output variables and second input and outputvariables may include at least one of temperature, pressure, and flowrate. The desired configuration may be a vertical pipe connected to ahorizontal pipe. The first configuration may be the vertical pipe, andthe second configuration may be the horizontal pipe. The desiredconfiguration may be a wellbore-reservoir. The first configuration maybe a porous medium, and the second configuration may be a vertical pipe.

In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a method forperforming remote experiments is provided. The method includesperforming numerical simulations and obtaining simulated results of adesired configuration via a numerical simulator. The desiredconfiguration may include at least a first configuration and a secondconfiguration. The method includes sending at least a first request anda second request to perform remote experiments for the desiredconfiguration to at least a first facility and second facility,respectively. The method includes running a first remote experiment atthe first facility to obtain a first output variable. The first facilitymay include the first configuration with a first input variable. Themethod includes simultaneously running a second remote experiment at asecond facility to obtain a second output variable. The second facilitymay include the second configuration with a second input variable. Themethod includes obtaining experimental results of the desiredconfiguration using the first and second input and output variables. Themethod includes validating and tuning the simulated results with theexperimental results using the numerical simulator. The first remoteexperiment may communicate with the second remote experiment such thatthe first output variable is set as the second input variable to mimicthe desired configuration.

The method may include using a server to send the first and secondrequests to perform remote experiments to the first or secondfacilities, respectively. The server may include a database of resultsfrom previously run remote experiments. The server may be configured tosearch the database for results from remote experiments previously runfor the desired configuration. The method may include using the serverto receive the first output variable from the first facility, and tosend the first output variable to the second facility for use as thesecond input variable. The method may include using a first dataacquisition system at the first facility, and a second data acquisitionsystem at the second facility. The first data acquisition system mayreceive the first request for remote experiments and run the firstremote experiment at the first facility to obtain the first outputvariable. The second data acquisition system may receive the secondrequest for remote experiments and run the second remote experiment atthe second facility to obtain the second output variable. The seconddata acquisition system may receive the first output variable from thefirst facility for use as the second input variable. The first andsecond data acquisition systems may operate valves, pumps andcompressors to set the first input variable and second input variable.

In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a system forperforming remote experiments is provided. The system includes a user, aserver, a first facility and a second facility, and a first dataacquisition system and a second data acquisition system. The user maysend a request to the server for experimental results of a desiredconfiguration. The desired configuration may include at least a firstconfiguration and a second configuration. The server may send at least afirst request and a second request to perform remote experiments for thedesired configuration to at least the first facility and secondfacility, respectively. The first data acquisition system may run afirst remote experiment in real-time at the first facility to obtain afirst output variable. The first facility may include the firstconfiguration with a first input variable. The second data acquisitionsystem may run a second remote experiment in real-time at a secondfacility to obtain a second output variable. The second facility mayinclude the second configuration with a second input variable. Thesecond data acquisition system may obtain experimental results of thedesired configuration using the first and second input and outputvariables. The first remote experiment may communicate with the secondremote experiment such that the first output variable is set as thesecond input variable to mimic the desired configuration.

The system may include a numerical simulator configured to performnumerical simulations and produce simulated results of the desiredconfiguration, and also validate and tune the simulated results with theexperimental results. The server may include a database of results frompreviously run remote experiments. The server may run a search of thedatabase for results from remote experiments previously run for thedesired configuration. The server may receive the first output variablefrom the first facility, and send the first output variable to thesecond facility for use as the second input variable. The second dataacquisition system may receive the first output variable from the firstfacility for use as the second input variable. The first and second dataacquisition systems may operate valves, pumps and compressors to set thefirst input variable and second input variable. The first input andoutput variables and second input and output variables may include atleast one of temperature, pressure, and flow rate.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an illustration of a pipeline configuration for an engineeringproblem that may require the use of remote experiments;

FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method for performing remote real-timeexperiments, according to an exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a system for automatic interaction betweenfacilities in different locations, according to an exemplary embodimentof the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a method for performing remote real-timeexperiments, according to an exemplary embodiment of the presentinvention;

FIG. 5 is a schematic of an experimental set-up for a method forperforming remote real-time experiments, according to an exemplaryembodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the present invention provide for apparatuses, systems,and methods for performing remote real-time experiments for wellchallenge diagnostics to access experimental results/data for aparticular configuration, and consequently, to more cost-effectivelyevaluate production diagnostics of well challenges related to multiphaseflow. Particularly, embodiments of the present invention provide forsystems and methods of remotely running in real-time one or moreinterconnected experiments physically located at differentlocations/facilities across the world. The experimental data may be usedto further validate and tune simulated data/results obtained fromsimulation models of the particular configuration. The present inventionalso provides for systems and methods for using remote real-timeexperiments to run tests to evaluate well challenges without the need ofmathematical models; rather, the system may communicate with numericalmodels to perform simulations. This system may be controlled andvisualized in real-time from any computer, smartphone, tablet, or anyother similar device with a user interface, as well as from any placewhere internet access is available.

In embodiments, different experimental set-ups/facilities may beremotely integrated with a web-based system so as to improveaccessibility, flexibility, and enhance the cost-benefit of building newlabs/facilities for well challenge diagnostics. Particularly, auser-friendly online environment may provide a link between numericalsimulators and field data validation, thereby improving the dynamics andreliability of validating simulation results, as well as makingvalidation of newly developed equipment/techniques faster and enhancingdemonstration of new engineering services and products.

Embodiments of the present invention may allow users to validate andtune their simulation results in real-time with live experimental datafor a wide range of conditions by simultaneously using differentfacilities around the world, which may then significantly increase thelevel of accuracy of numerical simulators. Running remote experimentssimultaneously with numerical simulators may also enhance the accuracyand range of application of known mathematical models. The use of remoteexperiments may further aid in reducing costs among different facilitiesand also increase the frequency of usage of such experiments by thesefacilities, thereby improving the cost-benefit of building newlabs/facilities. Additionally, the use of remote experiments to rundiagnostic tests may enhance the spreading of technology, since morepeople can be reached by the demonstration of these types ofexperiments, which was previously exclusively used by local users atthese facilities.

Embodiments of the present invention provide for various methods toperform remote experiments for well challenge diagnostics. In exemplaryembodiments, remote experiments may be performed via real-time remoteexperiments to test well challenges using (1) automatic interactionbetween remote experiments; and (2) real-time validation and tuning ofnumerical simulations.

1. Real-time Remote Experiments to Test Well Challenges Using AutomaticInteraction Between Remote Experiments

The primary barrier to perform remote experiments for well challengediagnostics is to design and implement an experimental set-up such asthe laboratory facilities described herein (for e.g., Facilities 1 to 4)having the necessary equipment and software to allow for remote use.These experimental set-ups/laboratory facilities must be able to cover awide range of conditions. For example, certain geometries for a wellconfiguration have to be built (namely, for e.g., vertical, inclined andhorizontal wells), with different pipe diameters and configurations (forsingle and multiple completions, and flow through production tubing andcasing-annulus). Once these facilities are made available for a varietyof geometries and operational conditions, they may be used to remotelyrun several different experimental diagnostics in multiphase flow.

Referring to FIG. 1, a pipeline configuration for a typical engineeringproblem that may require the use of the use of remote real-timeexperiments is shown. This particular configuration is shown purely forillustrative purposes, and will be used as a continuing example toillustrate the systems and methods described in FIGS. 2, 3, and 4.However, embodiments of the present invention may be used for any otherproblems/issues that require access and validation of experimental datafrom one or more remote facilities. See, e.g., FIG. 5.

FIG. 1 shows a connection of a vertical pipeline to a horizontalpipeline—a situation very commonly found in subsea systems. Here, liquidand gas flows through the vertical pipe connected to the horizontalpipe. A user/engineer may need to solve several engineering problemsassociated with this particular configuration. In exemplary embodiments,the engineer/user may wish to obtain the pressure profile of the pipe,and thereby determine the forecasted production of the pipe, and verifyrisk of hydrate in the flowlines (using the flowing pressure andtemperature information to verify the hydrate envelope). As shown inFIG. 1, the user may need to determine the pressure in the pipe outletfor a particular pressure and flow rate of gas and liquid in the pipeinlet.

To solve this problem, the user/engineer may need to numericallysimulate the pressure in the pipe outlet using a type of commercialsoftware. In an exemplary embodiment, the software may be the PIPESIM®Steady-State Multiphase Flow Simulator software by Schlumberger®. Thissoftware simulates multiphase flow in pipes, but often requiresexperimental or field data to validate its results. To perform thenumerical simulation and obtain simulated results, the user/engineer mayfirst set an initial configuration. As shown in FIG. 1, theuser/engineer may input the diameters of the vertical and horizontalpipes, as well as the pressure and liquid and/or gas flow rate at thepipe inlet. The numerical simulator software may then use its built-intheoretical models to mathematically calculate/predict the results forthis problem to obtain certain simulated results. In an exemplaryembodiment, the simulator will calculate/predict the pipe outletpressure based on the particular initial configuration and conditionsset by the user. Since the simulated results are simply theoretical andmathematical predictions of the physical system, the user/engineer maythen need to confirm and validate/compare the simulated results withactual experimental results derived from the same configuration, inorder to ensure that the simulated results match with the experimentalresults. For the problem illustrated in FIG. 1, the user/engineer mayneed to compare the predictions/simulations of the pipe outlet pressurewith the experimental/actual results from a physical system having thisconfiguration.

Referring to FIG. 2, a flowchart for a system and method for performingremote real-time experiments to access experimental data is shown. FIG.3 depicts a flowchart of a system for remote and automatic interactionbetween experimental set-ups/facilities in different locations. Thesystem and method shown in FIG. 2 may or may not include the system forremote and automatic interaction shown in FIG. 3. As shown, FIG. 2provides for systems and methods whereby an engineer/user may simplyneed to obtain experimental results from one or more remote facilities,without performing any prior numerical simulation. However, FIG. 2 isnot limited to such situations, and may also include situations wherethe engineer/user may obtain certain simulated results for a particularproblem/configuration, and may then need to validate/compare thesesimulated results with experimental results obtained from a physicalsystem having this same configuration. Further, although embodiments ofthe present invention provide for performing real-time experiments,experiments may also be performed non-real-time via previously savedexperiments and/or simulations, as described herein.

FIG. 2 illustrates a simplified system for obtaining/accessingexperimental results from remote facilities. A user/engineer may firstuse a computer including certain software to access a server for remoteexperiments. Computer may encompass any suitable processing device,including but not limited to a PC, tablet, and/or mobile phone. Computermay be adapted to execute any operating system including Linux™, UNIX™,Windows™, or any other suitable operating system. Server may be physicalor web based (e.g., Amazon Web Services). Server may be a commerciallyavailable server, e.g. an IBM System×M5 Tower servers. As shown, theserver is an internet-based server located in the cloud. In exemplaryembodiments, the server will contain a database of data from previouslyran experiments. The software may send a series of instructionssimultaneously to the server for remote experiments. In exemplaryembodiments, the internet-based server may then automatically use analgorithm to determine whether to send requests for remote experimentsto certain facilities.

In exemplary embodiments, the algorithm may follow a particular seriesof steps. First, the server may run a search of the database of savedexperimental data for experimental data from remote experimentspreviously ran by other users at similar conditions in differentfacilities in the database, including for example, Facilities 1, 2, 3,and 4 described herein. However, the database may include experimentaldata from any other facilities/experimental set-ups. As shown in FIG. 2,the software may access the server to determine whether an experimenthas already been run to determine a pipe outlet pressure for thepipeline configuration shown in FIG. 1. If these conditions werepreviously ran and saved in the database to obtain experimental resultsfor the desired configuration, these results may be sent back to theremote user/engineer for further validation. On the other hand, if theseconditions were not previously ran, the server may then scan the list offacilities in the database, and send a request to perform an experimentvia the internet to most appropriate facility/facilities for theparticular conditions/configurations described by the user. A remoteexperiment may then start running in a particular facility and/orinteract with other facilities if necessary. However, if another user isalready using a desired facility, the cloud system may schedule a remoteexperimental test in another available facility or book a test at analternative timeslot in the original facility.

In exemplary embodiments, Data Acquisition Systems/DataAcquisition/control systems (DAQ or DAS) may be located at a facilityand configured to communicate with the server and receive a request toperform a remote experiment. In an exemplary embodiment, the DAQ systemmay be any DAQ system offered by National Instruments®. Data acquisitionis the process of sampling signals that measure real world physicalconditions/phenomena (for e.g., temperature and pressure) and convertingthe resulting samples into digital numeric values that may bemanipulated by a computer. DAQs are a collection of software andhardware that measure or control certain physical characteristics in thereal world. DAQs typically convert analog waveforms into digital valuesfor processing. A DAQ may include DAQ measurement hardware, sensors andactuators, and a computer running programmable DAQ software. The sensorsmay be used to convert physical parameters to measurable electricalsignals. The DAQ hardware may act as the interface between a computerand signals from the outside world, and may primarily function as adevice that digitizes incoming analog signals so that a computer caninterpret them.

The DAQ hardware may include signal conditioning circuitry, ananalog-to-digital converter (ADC), and a computer bus. Signalconditioning circuitry may manipulate a signal into a form that issuitable for input into an ADC. ADC may convert analog signals fromsensors into digital signals prior to being manipulated by digitalequipment such as a computer. The computer bus may serve as thecommunication interface between the DAQ device and computer for passinginstructions and measured data.

The computer with programmable DAQ software may control the operation ofthe DAQ device and may be used for processing, visualizing, and storingmeasurement data. The DAQ software may include driver software andapplication software. Driver software may provide application softwarewith the ability to interact with a DAQ device. It may simplifycommunication with the DAQ device by abstracting low-level hardwarecommands and register-level programming. Typically, DAQ driver softwaremay expose an application programming interface (API) that is usedwithin a programming environment to build application software.Application software may facilitate the interaction between the computerand user for acquiring, analyzing, and presenting measurement data. Itmay either be a prebuilt application with predefined functionality, or aprogramming environment for building applications with customfunctionality. Custom applications may often be used to automatemultiple functions of a DAQ device, perform signal-processingalgorithms, and display custom user interfaces. In other embodiments,any other type of data acquisition systems may be used to receiverequests from the server to perform remote experiments. In an exemplaryembodiment, the DAQ software may be LabVIEW® by National Instruments®.

In embodiments of the present invention, one facility may have the exactconfiguration that is requested by the server, in which case the remoteexperiment may be performed, and experimental data derived, from thisfacility. However, in other embodiments, multiple facilities may haveaspects of the requested configuration. For example, as shown in FIG. 3,Facility 1 and Facility 2 together have the requested configurationsimilar to FIG. 1. However, any other facilities having a desiredconfiguration to perform remote experiments and access experimental datamay be used. Facility 1 has the capability of testing steady-statemultiphase flows in field scale vertical pipes/wellbores (up to 5,800feet deep). Facility 1 also includes a short horizontal section of pipe(approximately 20 feet long). However, Facility 1 does not offerdetailed instrumentation on long horizontal pipeline test sections atthe surface. On the other hand, Facility 2 features field scale (2,600feet long) horizontal pipeline as test sections with advancedinstrumentation, but does not have vertical wells on site.

In embodiments of the present invention, the server may send a requestto Facilities 1 and 2 to perform automatic and remote interconnectedexperiments to obtain experimental data regarding the pipe outletpressure for the particular configuration of pipeline shown in FIG. 1.As described herein, these requests may be received by DAQ systemslocated at both facilities. In Facility 1, a first DAQ system mayoperate electric actuated valves, pumps and/or gas compressors to setconditions in the inlet of the vertical pipe in Facility 1. Thesevalves, pumps and/or compressors may be connected to the inlet of anyfacility which is intended to be used remotely. In an exemplaryembodiment, valves, pumps and/or compressors are connected to the inletof both Facility 1 and Facility 2. Particularly, the electric actuatedvalves (which may be controlled by a voltage signal coming from thefirst DAQ system), and the pumps with variable speed drives (which maycontrol the flow rate and pressure at the inlet of the pipes inFacilities 1 and 2) may be used to set pressure and flow rates at theinlet of the remotely controlled Facilities 1 and 2. The sensors withinthe first DAQ system may measure the output pressure and flow rates ofFacility 1 and convert them into electrical signals, which may then beconverted into digital pressure and flow rate information. Thisinformation may then be sent back via the internet to the server, whichmay then redirect the same information to a second DAQ system located atFacility 2. Upon receiving this information, the second DAQ system maysimilarly operate electric actuated valves, pumps and/or gas compressorsto reproduce the levels of pressure and flow rate from the outlet ofFacility 1 in the inlet of the horizontal pipe of Facility 2.

As shown in FIG. 3, output pressure results are calculated from shorthorizontal pipe connected to the vertical pipe in Facility 1 (P_(out))using the known configurations of the pipes in Facility 1, as describedherein. In exemplary embodiments, these output pressure results ofFacility 1 (P_(out)) may then be used as the same input pressure for thehorizontal pipeline in Facility 2 (P_(in)) to simulate an actualphysical arrangement between Facility 1 and Facility 2. This transfer ofpressure information from Facility 1 to Facility 2 may be accomplishedby digital transfer over the internet using the DAQ systems as describedherein. In other embodiments, other conditions (for e.g., temperature,flow rate) from the outlet of a facility may also be transferred andused as the input conditions in the inlet of another facility. At thispoint, once the requested conditions are transferred and/or controlled,Facilities 1 and 2 may mimic the exact pipeline configuration describedherein and shown in FIG. 1. Although this type of outlet/inlet couplingmay not fully represent all the conditions in a physical system whereboth a vertical and horizontal pipeline are physically connected,embodiments of the present invention may still provide an alternativeand dynamic method of testing this type of configuration when it is notfeasible to reproduce this exact physical arrangement in a singlefacility.

The desired experimental results/data may then be acquired through theDAQ system located in Facility 2. In various embodiments, theseexperimental results may be sent to and stored in the server, sent backto numerical simulator or other software, and/or sent back directly tothe user.

2. Real-time Remote Experiments to Test Well Challenges Using Real-TimeValidation and Tuning of Numerical Simulations

In embodiments of the present invention, remote experiments may beperformed for well challenges diagnostics via real-time validation andtuning of numerical simulations. As discussed herein, real productiondata may not be available at the designing phase of a project or forparticular desired configurations, and so a user/engineer may runsimulations and obtain tentative simulated results without validation asto the accuracy of these results. FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrated systems andmethods for performing remote real-time experiment by accessing certainexperimental results, with or without the need for simulators. However,in exemplary embodiments, an engineer/user may obtain certain simulatedresults using numerical simulators for a particularproblem/configuration as described herein, and then use the numericalsimulators to further validate/tune and/or substantiate simulationresults with experimental results directly obtained dynamically and inreal-time via automatic interaction between remotefacilities/experimental set-ups, using the systems and methods shown inFIGS. 2 and 3.

Referring to FIG. 4, a flowchart of a system and method for performingremote real-time experiments for well challenges diagnostics usingnumerical simulators is shown. In an exemplary embodiment, auser/engineer may need to simulate and obtain experimental data from aconnection of vertical wells to horizontal pipelines. See, e.g., FIG. 1.The engineer/user may first set an initial configuration/conditions ofthe pipelines and then numerically simulate the pressure in the pipeoutlet using a type of commercial software as described herein to obtaincertain simulated results. Once these simulated results are obtained,the engineer may then access experimental data for a physical systemhaving this same configuration via the steps and components describedherein for FIGS. 2 and 3. In an exemplary embodiment, these experimentalresults may be stored in a server and/or send back to the numericalsimulator software that was used for obtaining the simulated results.The experimental results may then be compared to the simulated/numericalresults in a “Data Post-Processing Box.” As shown in FIG. 4, the DataPost-Processing Box includes a chart comparing the inlet gas velocityversus dynamic pressure. If the simulated results are inagreement/conform to the experimental results, the simulated results arevalidated. If the simulated results do not conform to the experimentalresults, the simulation results are not validated, and the user mayre-run the remote experiments. In a particular embodiment, theengineer/user may either re-run a simulation of this configuration andcompare resulting simulated results with the previously obtainedexperimental results. In another embodiment, the user may re-send arequest to the server for additional remote experiments of thefacilities to obtain additional experimental results.

Further, in some situations where a particular geometry or configurationis not available in any particular facility or facilities, thesimulation results may then be interpolated between at least twoseparate experimental runs, which may thereby cover the range ofconditions simulated in a numerical model. For example, if a user wishesto simulate flow in pipes with a diameter of 5.5″, but the availableapparatuses only have diameters of 4″ and 5″, a simulator may be used tointerpolate the results between the two pipe sizes. Once the simulatoreventually fully validates and tunes the simulated results, it may thensend these results back to the user/engineer and/or to the server withthe database.

Referring to FIG. 5, a schematic of an experimental set-up for a methodfor performing remote real-time experiments is shown. Particularly, FIG.5 shows an exemplary experimental set-up for performing remoteexperiments on well challenges to evaluate liquid loading in gas wellsusing an integrated wellbore-reservoir model. The set-up may be used toperform remote experiments using the same systems and methods describedin FIGS. 2, 3, and 4 herein. As shown, the set-up involves one facility;however, it may be configured to be used in multiple facilities to allowfor automatic and remote interconnection between the facilities.

Liquid loading is a very common problem in mature gas fields. It isestimated to occur in at least 90% of the producing gas wells in theU.S. During gas production, liquid (condensate or water) may accumulateat the bottom of the wellbore, increasing downhole pressure andtherefore significantly decreasing (or even ending) gas flow. Tounderstand the transient behavior in the reservoir related to liquidloading phenomena, studies such as Zhang et al. (2010) developed a modelto capture the transient fluid flow behavior in the near-wellborereservoir region. The later authors showed that bottomhole pressureoscillations have a significant impact on the inflow performance of thereservoir. The reason for this change in performance is the differencein time scale between the pressure variation in the wellbore andreservoir. While the pressure oscillations in the wellbore vary in theorder of milliseconds, the pressure waves in the reservoir travel in theorder of minutes or hours. The pressure profile obtained by Zhangindicates that re-injection of heavier fluids into the formation islikely to occur. The simulation results obtained from the fullytransient model developed by Zhang was confirmed experimentally in Liuet al. (2014). However, one of the main limitations of the model ofZhang is that the wellbore pressure oscillations used as boundaryconditions were created artificially, without the use of a coupledtransient model for the wellbore. On the other hand, the experimentalset-up of Liu could only capture the reservoir aspect of the modeling,without the multiphase flow in the wellbore.

Embodiments of the present invention provide for systems and methods forperforming remote experiments to further investigate the phenomenon ofliquid loading in gas wells using an integrated wellbore-reservoirmodel. In embodiments, since a reservoir cannot be practically attachedto a vertical or horizontal pipe (wellbore) in a lab environmentrestricted by its dimensions and complexity, a remote experiment runningsimultaneously with a numerical simulator may be able to mimic thedynamics of reservoir inflow performance and the behavior of themultiphase flow in the vertical pipes. As shown in FIG. 5, theexperimental set-up involves a vertical pipe, and a porous mediumattached or linked to the vertical pipe in such a manner that the set-upmay mimic the near-wellbore reservoir region. In an exemplaryembodiment, the porous medium may have a cylindrical shape, and may beapproximately six to ten feet long, and two to three inches in diameter.However, the porous medium may have any other shape to perform remoteexperiments.

In embodiments of the present invention, the system may control fluidsinflow in the bottom of the vertical pipe by using a previouslysimulated reservoir model. The simulated reservoir model may provide thevalues for the fluids inflow. Particularly, a flow loop boosting systemusing a pump and a gas compressor may artificially create the fluidinflow. The reservoir model may simulate conditions in the reservoir(for e.g., pressure and temperature) and send this information to beinputted at the inlet of the porous medium.

In a particular embodiment, the set-up may be located at one facility,and the porous medium may be directly attached to the vertical pipe tosimulate the wellbore-reservoir model. In another embodiment, the set-upmay be similar to the system described in FIGS. 3 and 4. In thisembodiment, the porous medium may be in a first facility, and thevertical pipe may be in a second facility, and the server may send arequest to the first and second facilities to perform automatic andremote interconnected experiments to obtain experimental data regardingbottomhole pressure of the vertical pipe. These requests may be receivedby DAQ systems located at both facilities, which may then operate inconjunction to provide experimental results using the systems describedin FIGS. 3 and 4. As shown in FIG. 5, the server may send a request to aDAQ system located at one facility. The DAQ system may operate electricactuated valves, pumps and/or gas compressors to set conditions in theinlet of the porous medium. See, FIG. 5. Software of the DAQ system maythen calculate output pressure results from the porous medium using theknown configurations of the porous medium, as described herein. Theseoutput pressure results from the porous medium may then be used as thesame input (bottomhole) pressure for the vertical pipeline. At thispoint, once the requested conditions are transferred and/or controlled,the facility may mimic the desired wellbore-reservoir model. The desiredexperimental results/data may then be acquired through the DAQ system.In various embodiments, these experimental results may be sent to andstored in the server, sent back to a numerical simulator for furthervalidation/tuning with a previously simulated reservoir model, and/orsent back directly to the user.

In some embodiments, a mixing tee may be attached to the bottom of thevertical pipe. Mixing Tees utilize a specifically engineered internalgeometry to efficiently mix two fluid streams into one combined stream,and are usually specifically designed for high pressure applications. Inother embodiments, the set-up may not include a mixing tee.

While the embodiment shown in FIG. 5 may not fully describe all themechanisms involved in the interaction between a wellbore and reservoirdue to limitations in the reservoir model coupled with the DAQ hardware,it nevertheless may still allow for a scenario whereby the parameters ofa reservoir (for e.g., relative permeability, capillary pressure andporosity) may be varied and their impact in liquid loading phenomena maybe better understood while using an experimental approach for coupledwellbore-reservoir.

Embodiments of the present invention may not only be used for liquidloading problems, but for several other well challenges where theinteraction wellbore-reservoir is important, including but not limitedto well tests with wellbore storage effects, well start-up andshut-downs, fluids bull heading and injection, wellbore slugging, wellkick-off and cleanup, dynamic water and gas coning.

While the embodiments are described with reference to variousimplementations and exploitations, it will be understood that theseembodiments are illustrative and that the scope of the inventions is notlimited to them. Many variations, modifications, additions, andimprovements are possible. Further still, any steps described herein maybe carried out in any desired order, and any desired steps may be addedor deleted.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for performing remote experiments,comprising: sending at least a first request and a second request toperform remote experiments for a desired configuration to at least afirst facility and second facility, respectively, wherein the desiredconfiguration includes at least a first configuration and a secondconfiguration; running a first remote experiment in real-time at thefirst facility to obtain a first output variable, the first facilityincluding the first configuration with a first input variable; running asecond remote experiment in real-time at a second facility to obtain asecond output variable, the second facility including the secondconfiguration with a second input variable; obtaining experimentalresults of the desired configuration using the first and second inputand output variables, wherein the first remote experiment communicateswith the second remote experiment such that the first output variable isset as the second input variable to mimic the desired configuration. 2.The method of claim 1, further comprising using a numerical simulator toperform numerical simulations of the desired configuration and obtainsimulated results, and to validate and tune the simulated results withthe experimental results.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprisingusing a server to send the first and second requests to perform remoteexperiments to the first or second facilities, respectively, wherein theserver includes a database of results from previously run remoteexperiments.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the server is configuredto search the database for results from remote experiments previouslyrun for the desired configuration.
 5. The method of claim 4, furthercomprising using the server to receive the first output variable fromthe first facility, and to send the first output variable to the secondfacility for use as the second input variable.
 6. The method of claim 1,further comprising using a first data acquisition system at the firstfacility, and a second data acquisition system at the second facility,wherein the first data acquisition system receives the first request forremote experiments and runs the first remote experiment at the firstfacility to obtain the first output variable, wherein the second dataacquisition system receives the second request for remote experimentsand runs the second remote experiment at the second facility to obtainthe second output variable.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the seconddata acquisition system receives the first output variable from thefirst facility for use as the second input variable.
 8. The method ofclaim 6, wherein the first and second data acquisition systems operatevalves, pumps and compressors to set the first input variable and secondinput variable.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the first input andoutput variables and second input and output variables include at leastone of temperature, pressure, and flow rate.
 10. The method of claim 1,wherein the desired configuration is a vertical pipe connected to ahorizontal pipe, wherein the first configuration is the vertical pipe,wherein the second configuration is the horizontal pipe.
 11. The methodof claim 1, wherein the desired configuration is a wellbore-reservoir,wherein the first configuration is a porous medium, wherein the secondconfiguration is a vertical pipe.
 12. A method for performing remoteexperiments, comprising: performing numerical simulations and obtainingsimulated results of a desired configuration via a numerical simulator,wherein the desired configuration includes at least a firstconfiguration and a second configuration; sending at least a firstrequest and a second request to perform remote experiments for thedesired configuration to at least a first facility and second facility,respectively; running a first remote experiment at the first facility toobtain a first output variable, the first facility including the firstconfiguration with a first input variable; running a second remoteexperiment at a second facility to obtain a second output variable, thesecond facility including the second configuration with a second inputvariable; obtaining experimental results of the desired configurationusing the first and second input and output variables; validating andtuning the simulated results with the experimental results using thenumerical simulator, wherein the first remote experiment communicateswith the second remote experiment such that the first output variable isset as the second input variable to mimic the desired configuration. 13.The method of claim 12, further comprising using a server to send thefirst and second requests to perform remote experiments to the first orsecond facilities, respectively, wherein the server includes a databaseof results from previously run remote experiments.
 14. The method ofclaim 13, wherein the server is configured to search the database forresults from remote experiments previously run for the desiredconfiguration.
 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising using theserver to receive the first output variable from the first facility, andto send the first output variable to the second facility for use as thesecond input variable.
 16. The method of claim 12, further comprisingusing a first data acquisition system at the first facility, and asecond data acquisition system at the second facility, wherein the firstdata acquisition system receives the first request for remoteexperiments and runs the first remote experiment at the first facilityto obtain the first output variable, wherein the second data acquisitionsystem receives the second request for remote experiments and runs thesecond remote experiment at the second facility to obtain the secondoutput variable.
 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the second dataacquisition system receives the first output variable from the firstfacility for use as the second input variable.
 18. The method of claim16, wherein the first and second data acquisition systems operatevalves, pumps and compressors to set the first input variable and secondinput variable.
 19. A system for performing remote experiments,comprising: a user; a server; a first facility and a second facility;and a first data acquisition system and a second data acquisitionsystem; wherein the user sends a request to the server for experimentalresults of a desired configuration, wherein the desired configurationincludes at least a first configuration and a second configuration,wherein the server sends at least a first request and a second requestto perform remote experiments for the desired configuration to at leastthe first facility and second facility, respectively, wherein the firstdata acquisition system runs a first remote experiment in real-time atthe first facility to obtain a first output variable, the first facilityincluding the first configuration with a first input variable, whereinthe second data acquisition system runs a second remote experiment inreal-time at a second facility to obtain a second output variable, thesecond facility including the second configuration with a second inputvariable, wherein the second data acquisition system obtainsexperimental results of the desired configuration using the first andsecond input and output variables, wherein the first remote experimentcommunicates with the second remote experiment such that the firstoutput variable is set as the second input variable to mimic the desiredconfiguration.
 20. The system of claim 19, further comprising anumerical simulator, the numerical simulator configured to performnumerical simulations and produce simulated results of the desiredconfiguration, and also validate and tune the simulated results with theexperimental results.
 21. The system of claim 19, wherein the serverincludes a database of results from previously run remote experiments,wherein the server runs a search of the database for results from remoteexperiments previously run for the desired configuration.
 22. The systemof claim 19, wherein the server receives the first output variable fromthe first facility, and sends the first output variable to the secondfacility for use as the second input variable.
 23. The system of claim19, wherein the second data acquisition system receives the first outputvariable from the first facility for use as the second input variable.24. The system of claim 19, wherein the first and second dataacquisition systems operate valves, pumps and compressors to set thefirst input variable and second input variable.
 25. The system of claim19, wherein the first input and output variables and second input andoutput variables include at least one of temperature, pressure, and flowrate.